473,327 Members | 1,967 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,327 software developers and data experts.

Diff. between singleton class and static class

DBA
Hi All,

What is the diff. between a singleton class and a static class in C#?
Nov 17 '05 #1
15 63497
KH
A static class does not allow an instance of itself to be created by anything
other than itself - it has no public ctors:

class T
{
private T() { }

public static T Get() { return new T(); }
};

T t1 = new T(); // Error, no public constructor
T t2 = T.Get(); // Ok
T t3 = T.Get(); // Ok; returns another instance of T

A singleton allows only one instance of the class to ever be created:

class S
{
private S() { }

private static S instance = new S();

public static S Get() { return S.instance; }
};

S s1 = new S(); // Error, no public constructor
S s2 = S.Get(); // Ok; always returns the same instnace
S s3 = S.Get(); // Ok; returns the same instance as s2


"DBA" wrote:
Hi All,

What is the diff. between a singleton class and a static class in C#?

Nov 17 '05 #2
DBA <DB*@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
What is the diff. between a singleton class and a static class in C#?


A singleton allows access to a single created instance - that instance
(or rather, a reference to that instance) can be passed as a parameter
to other methods, and treated as a normal object.

A static class allows only static methods.

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Nov 17 '05 #3
Hi,

first the currently there is no a way to declare a class static, you do it
implicitely by declaring static all the members of it. The members will
exist as long as the Appdomain does.

A singleton is a "normal" class with the only difference that the
constructor is private, hence the only way to "create" an instance is using
the property/method that return the instance. If needed you can also declare
a method that dispose the instance, so it can be recreated again when
needed.
cheers,

--
Ignacio Machin,
ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department Of Transportation

"DBA" <DB*@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D4**********************************@microsof t.com...
Hi All,

What is the diff. between a singleton class and a static class in C#?

Nov 17 '05 #4
Ignacio,

The statement:
first the currently there is no a way to declare a class static
Is not true. In the current beta release of C# 2.0, there is support
for static classes, where all of the members must be static (and the
compiler issues a warning if any of the members are not).

--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
"Ignacio Machin ( .NET/ C# MVP )" <ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us> wrote
in message news:uI**************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... Hi,

first the currently there is no a way to declare a class static, you do it
implicitely by declaring static all the members of it. The members will
exist as long as the Appdomain does.

A singleton is a "normal" class with the only difference that the
constructor is private, hence the only way to "create" an instance is
using the property/method that return the instance. If needed you can also
declare a method that dispose the instance, so it can be recreated again
when needed.
cheers,

--
Ignacio Machin,
ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department Of Transportation

"DBA" <DB*@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D4**********************************@microsof t.com...
Hi All,

What is the diff. between a singleton class and a static class in C#?


Nov 17 '05 #5
You can declare the entire class as static in VB. I believe the next version
of C# will also have that ability, but I'm not certain.

The only reasons (that I know) to use a singleton is if you need to pass it
to a function call. For example, an IComparer class.
--
Jonathan Allen
"Ignacio Machin ( .NET/ C# MVP )" <ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us> wrote
in message news:uI**************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
Hi,

first the currently there is no a way to declare a class static, you do it
implicitely by declaring static all the members of it. The members will
exist as long as the Appdomain does.

A singleton is a "normal" class with the only difference that the
constructor is private, hence the only way to "create" an instance is
using the property/method that return the instance. If needed you can also
declare a method that dispose the instance, so it can be recreated again
when needed.
cheers,

--
Ignacio Machin,
ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department Of Transportation

"DBA" <DB*@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D4**********************************@microsof t.com...
Hi All,

What is the diff. between a singleton class and a static class in C#?


Nov 17 '05 #6
Hi,

Yes, I meant that , just that I totally miswrote that sentence :)

cheers,

--
Ignacio Machin,
ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department Of Transportation

"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote in
message news:er**************@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
Ignacio,

The statement:
first the currently there is no a way to declare a class static


Is not true. In the current beta release of C# 2.0, there is support
for static classes, where all of the members must be static (and the
compiler issues a warning if any of the members are not).

--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
"Ignacio Machin ( .NET/ C# MVP )" <ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us>
wrote in message news:uI**************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
Hi,

first the currently there is no a way to declare a class static, you do
it implicitely by declaring static all the members of it. The members
will exist as long as the Appdomain does.

A singleton is a "normal" class with the only difference that the
constructor is private, hence the only way to "create" an instance is
using the property/method that return the instance. If needed you can
also declare a method that dispose the instance, so it can be recreated
again when needed.
cheers,

--
Ignacio Machin,
ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department Of Transportation

"DBA" <DB*@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D4**********************************@microsof t.com...
Hi All,

What is the diff. between a singleton class and a static class in C#?



Nov 17 '05 #7
DBA
KH, Jon Thank you for responses. One more question:
When to use a singleton class and when to use a staic class? I think both
has the same functionality

"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" wrote:
DBA <DB*@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
What is the diff. between a singleton class and a static class in C#?


A singleton allows access to a single created instance - that instance
(or rather, a reference to that instance) can be passed as a parameter
to other methods, and treated as a normal object.

A static class allows only static methods.

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

Nov 17 '05 #8
mdb
=?Utf-8?B?REJB?= <DB*@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
news:BE**********************************@microsof t.com:
KH, Jon Thank you for responses. One more question:
When to use a singleton class and when to use a staic class? I think
both has the same functionality


For one example, whenever you want to be able to pass the instance of the
class as a parameter to a function... Just because you have a
"singleton" class doesn't mean that there's only one singleton class
(although by definition there's only one instance of *each* of them)...
Such as...

public interface IWorkInterface
{
void DoSomeWork();
}

public SingletonA : IWorkInterface
{
.... singleton implementation ...
public void DoSomeWork() { ... }
}

public SingletonB : IWorkInterface
{
.... singleton implementation ...
public void DoSomeWork() { ... }
}

public void StartWork(IWorkInterface iwi)
{
iwi.DoSomeWork();
}

public void Main()
{
IWorkInterface singletonA = new SingletonA();
IWorkInterface singletonB = new SingletonB();

// here i'm passing the object - its a singleton
StartWork(singletonA);

// here i'm passing a different singleton
StartWork(singletonB);
}

--
-mdb
Nov 17 '05 #9

First, the Singleton Pattern generally creates a single instance of a
class, but
this is not absolute. In fact, you can argue that some of the
flexibility of the
Singleton Pattern is that it allows you the programmer to return more
than
one instance of a class at a later date without breaking the client
code. The
classic example is an expensive hardware resource. You implement this as
a
Singleton Pattern. Later, when you win the lottery you can purchase a
second
unit of this expensive hardware resource and recode the class factory to
return one of the two hardware controllers using load sharing. The
caller does
not know that there are now two units.

Perhaps it would help to think of where the code goes and how this could
help you understand the difference between static methods and fields and
a
Singleton Pattern.

In a Static call you have one set of static methods and fields in
memory. There
is no need for a pointer to the instance stack frame. Now let's go back
to the
classic Singleton where you have one instance of the class. Although the
code
for instance methods _appears_ to be copied for each instance so that
each
instance has BEHAVIOR, in reality the code for instance methods is
_shared_!
So the only real difference between Static calls and instance calls is
that
instance calls act on instance data and each instance has its own
separate
data in memory. But if you only have one instance then there is only one
copy
of instance data. SO, the only real difference between Static and a
single
instance is that there is a pointer to this to access the instance data.

There _are_ advantages to the Singleton pattern and they include:

1) Adds a level of indirection. This allows the creation of more than
one
instance of the class at a later date without breaking client code.
2) Encapsulates data and methods into a separate namespace, the
singleton
class.
3) Allows sub-classing.
4) Provides access control to the single instance.

Hope that helps.

Have fun storming the castle,
Jeff

*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Nov 17 '05 #10
Jeff Louie <je********@yahoo.com> wrote:
First, the Singleton Pattern generally creates a single instance of a
class, but this is not absolute. In fact, you can argue that some of
the flexibility of the Singleton Pattern is that it allows you the
programmer to return more than one instance of a class at a later
date without breaking the client code.
I'd argue that in that case it's a factory. Certainly the GoF book
defines a singleton in terms of only providing one instance. I agree
that using a singleton allows you to change it into a factory at a
later date without breaking client code though. (Assuming the client
code isn't relying on it being a singleton.)

<snip>
There _are_ advantages to the Singleton pattern and they include:
<snip>
3) Allows sub-classing.


It allows the singleton to be a subclass of something else. The normal
patterns that ensure that only a single instance is ever created don't
work well with subclasses. It can be done, but it's somewhat messy.

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Nov 17 '05 #11
Hi,
3) Allows sub-classing.


It allows the singleton to be a subclass of something else. The normal
patterns that ensure that only a single instance is ever created don't
work well with subclasses. It can be done, but it's somewhat messy.


Why messy?

It's the member who return the instance the one in charge of that, it could
work as a factory deciding at runtime an instance of what class to create
and return. Somewhere I saw a code like this:

public static SingletonClass GetInstance()
{
if ( instance == null )
{
//decide which class derived of SingletonClass to instantiate
return instance
}
}

cheers,

--
Ignacio Machin,
ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department Of Transportation

Nov 17 '05 #12
Hi,

Also there is the fact that you can control when to create the singleton,
even so you can create the singleton more than one time during the lifetime
of the app. The only thing that the singleton assure is that only one
instance exist at a given time, not that the same instance exist always.

cheers,

--
Ignacio Machin,
ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department Of Transportation
"mdb" <m_b_r_a_y@c_t_i_u_s_a__d0t__com> wrote in message
news:Xn****************************@207.46.248.16. ..
=?Utf-8?B?REJB?= <DB*@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
news:BE**********************************@microsof t.com:
KH, Jon Thank you for responses. One more question:
When to use a singleton class and when to use a staic class? I think
both has the same functionality


For one example, whenever you want to be able to pass the instance of the
class as a parameter to a function... Just because you have a
"singleton" class doesn't mean that there's only one singleton class
(although by definition there's only one instance of *each* of them)...
Such as...

public interface IWorkInterface
{
void DoSomeWork();
}

public SingletonA : IWorkInterface
{
... singleton implementation ...
public void DoSomeWork() { ... }
}

public SingletonB : IWorkInterface
{
... singleton implementation ...
public void DoSomeWork() { ... }
}

public void StartWork(IWorkInterface iwi)
{
iwi.DoSomeWork();
}

public void Main()
{
IWorkInterface singletonA = new SingletonA();
IWorkInterface singletonB = new SingletonB();

// here i'm passing the object - its a singleton
StartWork(singletonA);

// here i'm passing a different singleton
StartWork(singletonB);
}

--
-mdb

Nov 17 '05 #13
<"Ignacio Machin \( .NET/ C# MVP \)" <ignacio.machin AT
dot.state.fl.us>> wrote:
3) Allows sub-classing.


It allows the singleton to be a subclass of something else. The normal
patterns that ensure that only a single instance is ever created don't
work well with subclasses. It can be done, but it's somewhat messy.


Why messy?

It's the member who return the instance the one in charge of that, it could
work as a factory deciding at runtime an instance of what class to create
and return. Somewhere I saw a code like this:

public static SingletonClass GetInstance()
{
if ( instance == null )
{
//decide which class derived of SingletonClass to instantiate
return instance
}
}


In that case though, there's nothing to stop the derived class from
creating an instance of itself - or another derived class to derive
from the SingletonClass.

One of the benefits of the singleton pattern in its normal form is that
you can guarantee that the only thing that will create an instance of
the class is the class itself, because it only has a private
constructor. (Leaving reflection aside, of course.)

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Nov 17 '05 #14
Hi John.. In line.
Certainly the GoF book defines a singleton in terms of only providing one
instance.<

That is the "Intent", but one of the "Consequences" is "4. Permits a
variable
number of instances." GoF pp 128.
It allows the singleton to be a subclass of something else. The normal

patterns that ensure that only a single instance is ever created don't
work well with subclasses. It can be done, but it's somewhat messy.<

Hmm. I don't understand why this is messy. In C# an interface can be
looked
at as subclassing where a concrete class implements an interface or
extends a
pure virtual class. The singleton GetInstance method can return an
interface
type or a method can take a singleton reference of an interface type
allowing
you to program to an interface. The supplier supplies a single instance
of an
object that implements the contract, the interface.

Regards,
Jeff

*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Nov 17 '05 #15
Jeff Louie <je********@yahoo.com> wrote:
It allows the singleton to be a subclass of something else. The normal

patterns that ensure that only a single instance is ever created don't
work well with subclasses. It can be done, but it's somewhat messy.<

Hmm. I don't understand why this is messy. In C# an interface can be
looked at as subclassing where a concrete class implements an
interface or extends a pure virtual class. The singleton GetInstance
method can return an interface type or a method can take a singleton
reference of an interface type allowing you to program to an
interface. The supplier supplies a single instance of an object that
implements the contract, the interface.


See my reply to Ignacio - the normal singleton pattern is very elegant
in enforcing a single instance without ever having to actually check in
a constructor that it hasn't been constructed before, etc. With
subclassing some of that elegance goes away.

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Nov 17 '05 #16

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

9
by: Tim Clacy | last post by:
Would some kind soul suggest a pre-processor test for the C++ language revision whereby class static variables were specified to refer to the same instance? Specifically, the following Singleton...
5
by: Jake | last post by:
I'm just getting into design patterns and am not sure I fully understand the usefulness of the singleton. I know you can use it to ensure that you only have one instance of a class, but why would...
7
by: Atul Malaviya | last post by:
>From a design/usability perspective. When will one use a singleton pattern and when a class with purely static members? What are the pros and cons? I have inherited a code base which is full...
7
by: Jon Vaughan | last post by:
I have a piece of code that I want to run on a Pocket Pc, I have written a data class that will store the small amount of data that is required for the program. As this class will be used via a few...
3
by: Quantum | last post by:
Hi, What is the difference between a singleton class and a static class? From what I can tell, they both offer the same functionality, i.e. only one copy of a class. Thanks, Q
5
by: evaristobo | last post by:
i'm a bit confused here, a pointer is something aiming to an object, but a static class is not an object, nevertheless i would like to have the possibility of doing something like handling an...
13
by: learning | last post by:
Hi I have a static class written by other team which encapsulates a database instance. but I need to extend it to incldue other things. I know that C# static class is sealed and can;t be inherited...
4
by: John Doe | last post by:
Hi, I have a singleton class defined like this : class UIManager : public CSingleton<UIManager>, public CObject { protected: DECLARE_DYNAMIC(UIManager) friend class CSingleton<UIManager>;
3
by: puzzlecracker | last post by:
Would you quickly remind me the difference between, regular class, static class, and nested class? Thanks
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
1
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
0
by: ArrayDB | last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
1
by: PapaRatzi | last post by:
Hello, I am teaching myself MS Access forms design and Visual Basic. I've created a table to capture a list of Top 30 singles and forms to capture new entries. The final step is a form (unbound)...
1
by: CloudSolutions | last post by:
Introduction: For many beginners and individual users, requiring a credit card and email registration may pose a barrier when starting to use cloud servers. However, some cloud server providers now...
1
by: Shællîpôpï 09 | last post by:
If u are using a keypad phone, how do u turn on JavaScript, to access features like WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram....
0
by: af34tf | last post by:
Hi Guys, I have a domain whose name is BytesLimited.com, and I want to sell it. Does anyone know about platforms that allow me to list my domain in auction for free. Thank you
0
by: Faith0G | last post by:
I am starting a new it consulting business and it's been a while since I setup a new website. Is wordpress still the best web based software for hosting a 5 page website? The webpages will be...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.